aravot wrote:
In my opinion the ones that are high or medium high should have been fixed for RC1 specially this ->
http://forum.joomla.org/index.php/topic,191479.0.htmlPeter -
I must admit. I'm a bit taken back by some of your posts - not just this one. Listen - I think it's easy to get a "perfectionist view" on things - especially when you are actively working in the testing group (and, thanks
very much for that

.)
But, let's not forget, J! v 1.5 isn't done. But, it's very, very good! I've been building
three sites in it and I am not having many problems. (In fact one problem I am having no one else seems to be able to reproduce - I feel so alone!

). I'm not going live, yet, and I've seen vast improvements in the quality and stability of v 1.5 in the past several weeks.
Now, project that progress forward a month and I see good things.
I'm going for it with v 1.5 and I am not worried one bit. Having said that, I think people who can't be a little flexible and understanding and optimistic and hopeful should stay back. This is not perfect.
Thanks for having a good and critical eye on our testing, Peter. You probably should be a bit "negative" - you are supposed to find bugs and insist they get fixed. I'm benefiting from your work, as well.
Life is good in the open source end user community, folks.
Amy
