The Joomla! Forum ™



Forum rules


Global Rules



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1113 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 38  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:11 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Explorer
Joomla! Explorer

Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:51 am
Posts: 278
Location: Parker, Colorado USA
This thread is for discussing the following blog:
Feedback on potential Joomla! Framework LGPL license change

_________________
Paul Orwig


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:40 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:19 am
Posts: 10525
Location: Leeds, UK
Joomla was founded on the principle of Open Source Matters and a change to using the LGPL licence for the framework is completely against that. For those of you that don't know the LGPL allows the code to be included in proprietary, closed source software.

How does allowing people to produce closed source software with the Joomla Framework support the principle of Open Source Matters?

Just another rant?
Before you think this is Brian just going off on a rant of his own I'm not alone with this view. The Free Software Foundation, the people behind both the GPL and LGPL licences, agree.

Quote:
But we should not listen to these temptations, because we can achieve much more if we stand together. We free software developers should support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up better against the competition.

Source https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html available in multiple languages.

It doesn't effect Joomla?
The proposal states that this change is only for the Framework and it has no effect on the CMS but once again that is not 100% true.

Joomla is licenced GPLv2 or later but, and this is very important, the GPLv2 licence is NOT compatible with the LGPL v3 licence. Source: The perils of LGPLv3. Now to be fair the proposal statement doe not mention which version of the LGPL would be chosen but if we assume it is the latest version then that would mean a change in the licence for Joomla would be required as well.

So a statement that says "This potential license change would only apply to the Joomla Framework, but not to the Joomla Content Management System (CMS)." is, potentially, not true. IF the Framework uses LGPLv3 then Joomla would need to change its own licence to GPLv3 in order to use its own framework.

But our competitors use LGPLv3?
While some use a more permissive licence than the GPL others do not. Drupal for example uses GPLv3.

Who benefits?
The only people that really benefit are those people who want to take the Framework and use it in a proprietary piece of software. Are those same people likely to contribute to the Framework itself and help to develop it?

Open Source Matters
This is our founding principle. If someone won't use the Joomla framework because they want to use it to produce closed source, proprietary software then tough luck go and find another php framework to use.

In Summary
    This is against the principle of Open Source Matters
    This would, probably, mean changing the licence of Joomla to GPLv3
    The argument about competition is irrelevant.
    This only benefits those who wish to take open source software and use it in proprietary closed source software.
    And once againt this is against the principle of Open Source Matters

_________________
"Exploited yesterday... Hacked tomorrow"
Blog http://brian.teeman.net/
Joomla Hidden Secrets http://hiddenjoomlasecrets.com/


Last edited by brian on Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:53 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Enthusiast
Joomla! Enthusiast

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:18 pm
Posts: 141
Location: Italy
brian wrote:
In Summary
    This is against the principle of Open Source Matters
    This would, probably, mean changing the licence of Joomla to GPLv3
    The argument about competition is irrelevant.
    This only benefits those who wish to take open source software and use it in proprietary closed source software.
    And once againt this is against the principle of Open Source Matters

+1 brian
No LGPL license

_________________
Member of the Italian Joomla Translation Team - Joomla.it
Joomlahost.it - Hosting dedicato a Joomla


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:20 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 3:47 pm
Posts: 17327
Location: **Translation Matters**
++
NO LGPL
I agree totally with Brian, as I stated already in the former discussions.

_________________
Jean-Marie Simonet / infograf · http://www.info-graf.fr
Multilanguage in 2.5: http://help.joomla.org/files/EN-GB_multilang_tutorial.pdf
---------------------------------
Joomla Translation Coordination Team • Joomla! Production Working Group


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:23 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 8:19 am
Posts: 16
Location: Kirchberg
**NO LGPL** please...

totally agree with Brian

_________________
Joomla! News, Tipps and Video-Tuts in German
http://www.joomlainfo.ch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:39 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Enthusiast
Joomla! Enthusiast

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 1:17 pm
Posts: 220
NO to LGPL

_________________
NoNumber.nl - Extensions for Joomla!
Advanced Module Manager, Articles Anywhere, Better Preview, CDN for Joomla!, Cache Cleaner, Components Anywhere, DB Replacer, Modals, Modules Anywhere, ReReplacer, Sliders, Sourcerer, Tabs, Tooltips, What? Nothing!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:43 am 
Joomla! Fledgling
Joomla! Fledgling

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:40 am
Posts: 2
Location: Switzerland
NO, absolutely NO to LGPL


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:45 am 
Joomla! Intern
Joomla! Intern

Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:55 pm
Posts: 85
*NO LGPL* please

100% agree with Brian


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:54 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Guru
Joomla! Guru

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:07 pm
Posts: 543
Location: Århus
No to LGPL !

_________________
rbuelund
Member of the Danish Joomla Translation Team
http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/danish/
http://danskjoomla.dk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 11:55 am 
User avatar
Joomla! Enthusiast
Joomla! Enthusiast

Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 3:37 pm
Posts: 237
Location: The Netherlands
NO to LGPL

_________________
Awesome Joomla! Extensions by Chill Creations http://www.chillcreations.com
cciDEAL, ccInvoices, ccNewsletter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:03 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:01 pm
Posts: 21
Location: Madeira Island - Portugal
Brian Teeman has his finger on the pulse.
A big NO to relicensing. Closed source, proprietary software is not Open Source Software!

_________________
Web Design Specialists - Madeira Island, Portugal  http://www.navegabem.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:05 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Virtuoso
Joomla! Virtuoso

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:23 pm
Posts: 4545
Location: Finland / Norway
No to LGPL, Brian is right - it would be a bad move!

_________________
Rune Rasmussen - http://www.syntaxerror.no
Norske nettløsninger og integrasjoner, CONSIGNOR EDI, Mamut ordreimport og produkteksport, kortbetaling og faktura m.m.

Norsk Joomla! - Norwegian Translation Team - http://www.norskjoomla.no


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:11 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:01 pm
Posts: 9
No to LGPL

Stop with the legal stuff, stick to a single vision.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:12 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice

Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:33 pm
Posts: 41
brian wrote:
In Summary
    This is against the principle of Open Source Matters
    This would, probably, mean changing the licence of Joomla to GPLv3
    The argument about competition is irrelevant.
    This only benefits those who wish to take open source software and use it in proprietary closed source software.
    And once againt this is against the principle of Open Source Matters


NO to LPGL


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:13 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 7:13 am
Posts: 16549
No to the LGPL.

_________________
Joomla forum global moderator.

Have fun


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:14 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Explorer
Joomla! Explorer

Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:51 pm
Posts: 346
Location: /home/radek
I'm very glad we can publicly talk about it. Thanks Paul for asking.

A clear no from me.

_________________
Open Source Matters, Inc. Board Member | Events Team Co-Leader | OSM to JED liaison | JET Team Member
SobiPro Developer.
Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | : http://radek.sigsiu.net
Blog: http://radeks.coffee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:22 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Hero
Joomla! Hero

Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 2454
Location: Brasov - Romania
No to the LGPL from me too.

_________________
My latest project - http://www.extraglaze.co.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:24 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:36 pm
Posts: 5
Location: Lille / France
No to the LGPL.

100% agree with Brian


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:44 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Intern
Joomla! Intern

Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 9:30 am
Posts: 57
Location: Berlin, Germany
Competition is always relevant. Best of both Worlds.
With the 64% (surprise!).

_________________
B01
http://www.prime-real.de http://www.jfewo.de


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 12:57 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Guru
Joomla! Guru

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 598
Location: Canuck via MKE
The idea of working together against proprietary software vendors is important. I must say I had not considered that before. And re-licensing the CMS is a complete non-starter.

If the latter was not an issue, my thought is that although "increased adoption" of the platform/framework would be great, it's not a significant justification.

What is more important to me is the folks who developed the framework/platform and are currently developing it (PLT). If they are requesting it, are we in danger of a developer exodus if we don't change the license?

Expanding on that, when Miro changed the Mambo license against the developers wishes, it caused a split. Is the LGPL another watershed moment where NOT changing the license could have the same affect?

_________________
Victor Drover
http://anything-digital.com - Joomla Extensions and Custom Development
https://watchful.li - Remote backup, update and security monitoring for Joomla.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:03 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:19 am
Posts: 10525
Location: Leeds, UK
vdrover wrote:

Expanding on that, when Miro changed the Mambo license against the developers wishes, it caused a split. Is the LGPL another watershed moment where NOT changing the license could have the same affect?


Small point of historical correction the Mambo/Joomla split was not caused by any change in licence. Miro neither did nor proposed to change the licence from GPLv2.

_________________
"Exploited yesterday... Hacked tomorrow"
Blog http://brian.teeman.net/
Joomla Hidden Secrets http://hiddenjoomlasecrets.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:11 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Guru
Joomla! Guru

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 598
Location: Canuck via MKE
Can you remind me of what DID cause the split? I thought it was licensing.

_________________
Victor Drover
http://anything-digital.com - Joomla Extensions and Custom Development
https://watchful.li - Remote backup, update and security monitoring for Joomla.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:15 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Enthusiast
Joomla! Enthusiast

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 169
Location: Estonia
NO to LGPL

_________________
Estonian Translation Team - http://www.eraser.ee


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:17 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:19 am
Posts: 10525
Location: Leeds, UK
vdrover wrote:
Can you remind me of what DID cause the split? I thought it was licensing.


For the full reason please read Andrew's letter at the time viewtopic.php?f=8&t=72

Licensing was never part of it

_________________
"Exploited yesterday... Hacked tomorrow"
Blog http://brian.teeman.net/
Joomla Hidden Secrets http://hiddenjoomlasecrets.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:18 pm 
Joomla! Apprentice
Joomla! Apprentice

Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 8:21 am
Posts: 7
I do agree with Brian.
to Brian: Excellent post of yours
http://brian.teeman.net/joomla/820-joom ... gpl-say-no
#thumbsup


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:18 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Enthusiast
Joomla! Enthusiast

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:29 am
Posts: 243
Location: Cuba
brian wrote:
In Summary
    This is against the principle of Open Source Matters
    This would, probably, mean changing the licence of Joomla to GPLv3
    The argument about competition is irrelevant.
    This only benefits those who wish to take open source software and use it in proprietary closed source software.
    And once againt this is against the principle of Open Source Matters


+1000 Brian

A CLEAR NO!!!! FROM ME

_________________
Twitter: @J_carrod || Facebook: JCarlos || Google: +CarlosRodriguez_Joomla

Blog: http://www.joomla-plus.org


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:22 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:41 am
Posts: 15753
I'm not here to say yes, or no, to this license change. It just happens to have been covered in an article which might help people with some more background. See http://opensource.com/business/14/1/wha ... ce-project.

_________________
Regards Robin

http://www.linkedin.com/in/robinmuilwijk - http://twitter.com/i_robin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:24 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Guru
Joomla! Guru

Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 598
Location: Canuck via MKE
So the split was a copyright issue. In any case, my question remains: Is this another watershed moment?

_________________
Victor Drover
http://anything-digital.com - Joomla Extensions and Custom Development
https://watchful.li - Remote backup, update and security monitoring for Joomla.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:25 pm 
User avatar
Joomla! Master
Joomla! Master

Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 7:19 am
Posts: 10525
Location: Leeds, UK
vdrover wrote:
So the split was a copyright issue. In any case, my question remains: Is this another watershed moment?


No it was much more than that as Andrew explained in the link I provided.

_________________
"Exploited yesterday... Hacked tomorrow"
Blog http://brian.teeman.net/
Joomla Hidden Secrets http://hiddenjoomlasecrets.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:26 pm 
Joomla! Ace
Joomla! Ace

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:51 am
Posts: 1223
Location: France Grenoble
No to the LGPL.

_________________
Books and tutorials about Joomla! http://kiwik.net/en


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 1113 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 38  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group