Jenny wrote:
I don't understand what you mean when you state we have the Joomla logo on our site, because as far as I know it is not ANYWHERE on our site
Please "READ". I never mentioned you used Joomla logo. I mentioned
name (!) to which your referred to in an earlier post.
Quote:
whereas you have used the Joomla Logo contrary to the actual checklist that you filled out, and make it look like people are going to get a download link to download the upgrade for Joomla, but instead are directed to your Upgrading Service page
That is an interpretation and I simply do not agree with that assessment but based on Chad's email we have corrected that as per request and/or suggestion by Elin as stated in Chad's email.
Quote:
You also combine the Limited use Logo with other images which is also a no-no according to the brand manual.
Our site does not contain a single Joomla logo nor Joomla-image at any of the links any longer as mentioned in my email reaction to Chad who I requested to forward my email to the Team which includes you I assume.
Quote:
Not sure what you expect us to do, when you do not follow the clear instructions, and continue to waste our time.
Your current tone of communication has no merit. I stated that I asked guidance. At least Chad was so kind to point one issue out after his review which was immediately addressed and corrected
Quote:
We will follow up and make sure an email is sent out with requests to correct the problem.
Better get updated since that was done by Chad and responded to accordingly by me with a copy to Elin.
Quote:
provided you follow the guidelines, and rules that are set out. You seem to not want to.
Rude, nonsense and a wrong perception again as you can see above and per email-response to Chad. Facts are Jenny that we reacted immediately to each issue brought to our attention:
* After 5 years of using the previous name this was suddenly not longer possible. We followed up and re-branded so we comply to the guidelines....(no more 'Joom' in our name)
* Chad forwarded concerns day before yesterday he and Elin had related to the Upgrade announcement you refer to which was addressed within minutes so we changed and comply to the guidelines
* All images had been already removed prior to Chad's email after consulting the "conditional use guidelines" to avoid a large disclaimer as required to which we do not object but do not want on our site. So we followed up by removing any "conditional" logo or mixtures
Its shows our commitment to comply to the guidelines so your remark is therefor beyond facts and simply meant to insult it seems
Quote:
If you see violations to policy, then please report those listings, through the reporting system on the JRD.
I noted this and asked for guidance since it seems not consistent. That's why expressed my question. I have not a single desire to play guardian angel on your JRD. That's your task not mine. I personally do not care the least!
Thanks Jenny for your 'kindness'.
Cheers
Leo