Unfortunatly the folks who are doing the most complaining aren't interested in Open Source...
One of my personal heroes is Andy Grove...
Two things he said (one of which relates to the video you mentioned):
(Paraphrasing)
Quote:
Discussion is good up to a point and that point is when the decision has been made. After that discussion must end and if you want to be successful you have to put aside your own personal opinion and do whatever it takes to make that decision work. If you just go on discussing it forever neither the right choice or the wrong choice gets done. Discussion is only productive during the planning stage. after that it only serves to divert you from the goal of making progress.
Second Quote which is where I was coming from in my original post...
Quote:
Not all problems have a technological answer, but when they do, that is the more lasting solution.
I am proposing that this issue has a technological answer. If people would stop looking for the social or legal, and work towards that technological answer this problem would not only be solved now but most likely forever!
Lets stop focusing on the CAN'T do and get working on the CAN DO attitude that got us this far.
I think the Devs, OSM, and the mods, have done a good job in bringing the issue that has always existed out into the open. An issue that truth be told is not really of their making but merely a deficiency in the way the GPL itself was written.
the GPL seems to me to be more concerned with the growth of GPL than it is concerned with the growth of any idea protected by that GPL. It says they are talking about Free ideas not Free beer but the truth of the matter is that in order to be compatible with a GPL license it must also be free beer! Sure you can charge for your idea but after the first charge that idea turns to free beer!
All due to the requirement and specified right of COPY (verbatim) distribution...
Verbatim distribution is not really needed to diseminate those ideas. What is needed it the right to modify and distrubute those modifications so that these ideas can be put to use without restriction. I'm sure many P3PDs would have less of a problem if they knew that their version of the program was going to be their version until they changed it. And if they knew their competition was going to be only people who could add to their original idea then they might not have as many problems GPLing under those conditions.
But no one from Joomla or OSM can solve this issue for them in a legal or social way.
If anyone wants to solve it this way they should petition FSF to create a new license that allows free distributions for modified ideas not verbatim. Waste of time trying to get that changed here.
If they are interested in the technological solution then roll up your sleeves and help the Teams to create one. It will be more long lasting for sure and would solve the problem not just now but 50 years from now!
It will also serve to accelerate the push towards V2.0 of Joomla since the more coders working to make the seperation of API with the CMS will free up the core Developers to work on other more pressing needs like a more finely tuned ACL, a much better CMS to complement the API such as Multi Cat content and Standards based output.
United we stand and grow...
Divided we fall and get nowhere!
I have to think the P3PDs if they stopped and thought about this without the self centered emotions they would see that they have just as much ability to change the Project known as Joomla as anyone does.
All it requires is creating code you won't make a buck off of now but lots of bucks off later when the project is finally able to allow proprietary work to be combined with this free idea.